|
|
|
|
| Friday, July 09, 2010
6:10:58 PM | This is an issue that evokes mixed response as several individuals feel marital union doesn’t necessitate financial compatibility even as some feel that joint finances are necessary to achieve financial goals.
In my case ..I feel I save better post marriage
What do you Aspexians think ? | |
| |
| | | Friday, July 09, 2010
7:23:49 PM | Give it to the financial savy person to handle...but do track ...the plan...and support as required...as not participating does'nt relieve you from the responsibility..of the outcome which is shared too...
Only problem...all expenses and withdrawls get tracked ..but thankfully my Indian guju grocery store owner gives me cash back ...hNe hNe ...otherway keep me alive...:) | |
| |
| | | Friday, July 09, 2010
7:30:48 PM | | Samit ..Financial savy as in u mean anyone of the husband and wife..or a Financial Planning Manager as in a 3rd person | |
| |
| | | Friday, July 09, 2010
9:29:52 PM | I meant at initial stage Husband or wife...later on you need a financial planner...unless either of you can devote adequate time to monitor and act...
Still though you need to be alert I guess..
| |
| |
| | | Friday, July 09, 2010
10:08:50 PM | MARRIED COUPLES bolte ? :)
| |
| |
| | | Friday, July 09, 2010
11:07:24 PM | Auuuuuuun,
...bolte bojhay jara "Unmarried" ba "Decoupled" noy! :) | |
| |
| | | Friday, July 09, 2010
11:27:06 PM | | Brilliant Apu .....ta ..ei ..topice..tor motamot ta ..jana .. | |
| |
| | | Saturday, July 10, 2010
1:31:14 AM | Shome,
Muro jhNata-r bortomaan-e mukh khulibar duhshahosh kaharo achhe ki ? :)
| |
| |
| | | Saturday, July 10, 2010
12:20:07 PM | | Can you elaborate ny learned frend ...btw ..is this some kinda ..chinese connexion ..working | |
| |
| | | Saturday, July 10, 2010
1:48:37 PM | Sakol-i tomaari iccha
Icchamoyee Taara tumi
Tomaar karmo tumi karo Maa
Lok-e bole kori aami... | |
| |
| | | Saturday, July 10, 2010
1:50:04 PM | | Ei chilo tor mone Mithun ..maane tui bolchish u get pocket money like you used to get when you were in school... | |
| |
| | | Saturday, July 10, 2010
4:00:58 PM | | NO...unless wife is Paris Hilton. | |
| |
| | | Saturday, July 10, 2010
4:36:35 PM | @Nilanjan..if we assume for a moment..( lets say a couple of moments...) your wife is Paris Hilton..
Why you would like to keep separate accounts..?
| |
| |
| | | Saturday, July 10, 2010
5:43:36 PM | Samit-da...ei re..ami joke ta puro makhiye phelecchhi :) :)
ota hobe
'YES...unless wife is Paris Hilton !!!'
Ei jonnei bodhoy bole (slip) of pen is more painful than the sword!! lol | |
| |
| | | Saturday, July 10, 2010
6:20:18 PM | | Sorry to butt in but personally I feel finances should be kept separate. 1 joint a/c should be there however. Family expenses oikhan theke cholbe. Contribution should be 50-50 in case of both working couples. Bakigulote each other ke nominee kore dewa jete pare. | |
| |
| | | Saturday, July 10, 2010
10:32:33 PM | | ARM i agree with u ... | |
| |
| | | Sunday, July 11, 2010
9:47:53 AM | | Mr Bond ..if my wife was Paris ...I would not have started this ..thred at all...hahhahahahhaa...u know what i mean | |
| |
| | | Sunday, July 11, 2010
7:17:27 PM | Yes ..Shome...I know ...you will be a millionaire just from royalty :)
somehow the innocent dropping of names in this thread like Paris Hilton...has created a mild stir..:)
But she can very well be a digger...and even if one becomes her spouse...I beleive the lawyers will take care in the marraige contract so an subsequent divorce will leave her assests ( all kind hne hne ) untouched...
But coming back to the topic...having a common account with equitable participation shows trust and solidarity ? Is it?
| |
| |
| | | Monday, July 12, 2010
11:12:20 AM | Agreed ...Sir
However ..there should be enough space ..in terms of asking questions on the nature of expense ..at times ..when there is equitable partcipation in the accounts
P.S Agree with you on PH ...she could be one ..renowned gold digger ...or for that matter I could be one permanent ..slave ...hhahahahhahaa | |
| |
| | | Monday, July 12, 2010
11:48:21 AM | On a non-Hilton note and staying away from exotic cities of France..
Joint account is not required to meet household expenses. The contribution can be worked out by individuals based on capacity to pay and areas ear-marked. e.g one pays house rent while other pays the electricity bills.
For investements etc. maye be a joint account maybe a system requirement e.g ECS towards a housing loan EMI. But other investements might require pooling or resources and brains, single or joint account notwithstanding.
But sharing accounts and e-mails id-s and passwords as signs of trust and love etc..... no, I don't think these are related. | |
| |
|
|
|
|
In Order To Post A New Message, You Must Be Logged In. |
|
|
| Fields marked with * are mandatory |
| Topic |
SHOULD MARRIED COUPLES KEEP THEIR FINANCES SEPARETE |
| Post Your Reply Here * |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|